Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Get or give advice on equipment, reloading and other technical issues.

Moderator: Mod

Message
Author
BATattack
Posts: 1280
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:29 pm

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#46 Postby BATattack » Sat Feb 04, 2023 6:24 pm

Tim N wrote:It may have been like that from the factory


Like Tim said. Sharp folds that look like splits are usually from factory. Excess lube usually just leave a dent that will blow out during firing.

macguru
Posts: 1627
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#47 Postby macguru » Sat Feb 04, 2023 7:09 pm

i sent a box back for replacement but i am looking at alternatives. Overall I like the calibre but its certainly not suitable for someone starting out. Thats creedmore territory... or 308.
id quod est

PeteFox
Posts: 601
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:20 pm
Location: 7321 Tas.

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#48 Postby PeteFox » Sun Feb 05, 2023 3:38 pm


macguru
Posts: 1627
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#49 Postby macguru » Sun Feb 05, 2023 6:07 pm

a little overpriced ? I am going to buy some hornady loads and shoot them :)
Last edited by macguru on Sun Feb 05, 2023 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
id quod est

Lithgow
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 8:07 pm

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#50 Postby Lithgow » Sun Feb 05, 2023 6:27 pm

247 cases! 150 of which are brand new ADG which is a 12 month wait if your lucky enough to make the waiting list....
As a per case rate, still only works out to $2.22 ea.
Lapua is $3.10Ea and at least 18 months away.
It's a great price imo
Steve G
Nowra Rifle Club NSW

macguru
Posts: 1627
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#51 Postby macguru » Sun Feb 05, 2023 6:28 pm

i think i misread the ad cheers. is ADG brass any good ? Is bertram brass any good ?
id quod est

Lithgow
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 8:07 pm

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#52 Postby Lithgow » Sun Feb 05, 2023 7:17 pm

I use Lapua and now also Bertram.
Bertram is an unknown to me at the moment, currently fireforming but will test at full charge next week
ADG is highly sought after, excellent quality and has great longevity ( as good as Lap )
Steve G
Nowra Rifle Club NSW

macguru
Posts: 1627
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#53 Postby macguru » Tue Feb 07, 2023 7:12 pm

I got a full refund on 50/150 nosler cases that I bought from one supplier. I sent them a photo of the case crack after 2 firings and they offered a refund so I accepted. (the other 100 were from somewhere else and ill have to keep them)
id quod est

macguru
Posts: 1627
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#54 Postby macguru » Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:35 pm

I also have 97 bertram (used) cases that I just purchased at a very good price. I am fairly confident that with my body die and competition shellholder set I will be able to prep them OK. I am just using the normal shellholder at the moment with the my 100 nosler cases and its fine, no chambering problems.
More generally, I would say the 6.5prc is great, but its a bit over the top as your only rifle. For mids Fopen, or as a second SH gun, its great. But for everyday with the latter I would get a creedmore or a 308. Its cheaper to run.
id quod est

macguru
Posts: 1627
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#55 Postby macguru » Sun Feb 12, 2023 8:54 am

I can get some bertram brass from the maker .... is it good ? remember its for SH not open :)
id quod est

Lithgow
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 8:07 pm

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#56 Postby Lithgow » Sun Feb 12, 2023 12:15 pm

Aside from oldschool brass prep, they are great!
2nd firing of it has proven successful, both high and low charge.
The case head seems very hard so won't show pressure as easily so bolt lift and primer inspection will be very important.
Steve G
Nowra Rifle Club NSW

macguru
Posts: 1627
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#57 Postby macguru » Thu Feb 16, 2023 12:24 pm

yeah the rcbs dies were def. hard on the necks... the new 3 die setup (Forster bush die, redding body die, forster mic seating die) I have is not causing any problems with the nosler brass. But I have some Bertram cases coming as well.
id quod est

DaveB
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:50 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#58 Postby DaveB » Fri Feb 17, 2023 9:13 am

download/file.php?mode=view&id=7532
Missed a zero 6.9" at 1000yds....
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by DaveB on Fri Feb 17, 2023 10:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

macguru
Posts: 1627
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

#59 Postby macguru » Fri Feb 17, 2023 9:22 am

Yeah, I had 100 new cases arrive yesterday. I found the bertram guy on facebook but i bought them from rebel. I had to run it through the neck bushing to fit my tikka, because the neck was catching in the throat, because its thicker than the nosler by a couple of thou, so it should last :) looks like no other problems... should be fine
id quod est


Return to “Equipment & Technical”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests