
2012 America Match
Moderator: Mod
-
- Posts: 1121
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 2:56 pm
- Location: SA
-
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:07 pm
- Has thanked: 413 times
- Been thanked: 330 times
lynn,
unless you have to get a twin port stolle to shoot fast enough to compete when electronic targets dictate that rate of fire is mandatory.
bruce.
unless you have to get a twin port stolle to shoot fast enough to compete when electronic targets dictate that rate of fire is mandatory.
bruce.
"SUCH IS LIFE" Edward Kelly 11 nov 1880
http://youtu.be/YRaRCCZjdTM
http://youtu.be/YRaRCCZjdTM
-
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:35 am
Your sarcasm was noted Lynn. I just get the feeling that some people think F/TR will just replace FS without the relisation that making the 8.25kg all up weight is going to be a battle for most people. Sure, it could be done, but it's going to cost money. It's not just a matter of changing what it's called.
-
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 7:23 pm
- Location: Singleton NSW
- Has thanked: 715 times
- Been thanked: 760 times
For one match, no, not many people would bother. But if you want to try Match rifle F class, they now have an F/TR class in Australia.
The majority of people would prefer F std as it is in Australia, fair enough, its a good combination for 300-1000yds shooting, but if you want to try the 1000-1200 yd Match Rifle/F class, screwing in an F/TR spec barrel will give you some good long range practice should you decide to shoot overseas sometime.
The majority of people would prefer F std as it is in Australia, fair enough, its a good combination for 300-1000yds shooting, but if you want to try the 1000-1200 yd Match Rifle/F class, screwing in an F/TR spec barrel will give you some good long range practice should you decide to shoot overseas sometime.
-
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:05 pm
- Location: Woodanilling