Legal Projectiles

For general announcements, and anything which does not fit into one of the categories below.

Moderator: Mod

bolster55
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:46 pm
Location: NE Vic
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

Legal Projectiles

Post by bolster55 »

Hello All,
Where can I find details regarding legal projectiles for F Class shooting.
DannyS
Posts: 1032
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:33 pm
Location: Hamilton
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 69 times
Contact:

Post by DannyS »

NRAA member update no.36
macguru
Posts: 1684
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 230 times
Been thanked: 164 times

Post by macguru »

LOL
TTBS28
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:27 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by TTBS28 »

Where can I find a copy of NRAA member update no.36 on the National web-site?

Thanks........Jeff. Roberts.
TOM
Posts: 381
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:35 am

Post by TOM »

You can't.

You'll find 37 on the QRA web page but that aint gonna help you though. 36 is AWOL.
TTBS28
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:27 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by TTBS28 »

Thanks for that. Does that mean that the proposed use of Bergers is not yet legal. I understood that it was to come into effect as at 1/1/13 BUT if it has not been added to the SSR's for all to see then I would assume that their use is not yet legal - correct?


Regards.........Jeff. Roberts.
TOM
Posts: 381
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:35 am

Post by TOM »

Best way would be to shoot of an email to the NRAA and ask for a ruling on approved projectiles. Like you, Im of the understanding that Jan 1st was the introduction date, but... It would be nice to have official notification.
Malcolm Hill
Posts: 335
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:40 pm
Location: Mid North S.A.
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 107 times

Post by Malcolm Hill »

Member update no. 36 said quite clearly that the Bergers would be legal(in principle) from Jan 1st subject to certain conditions mentioned in the questionnaire that was previously sent out to members. I recall that one of those conditions was that they be made available at a competitive cost to what we already had. So does that mean that they are technically not legal because they cannot be purchased at roughly the same cost as the HBC"s? I have seen no further reference to that part of the document in relation to their legality. I think it has been conveniently filed in the stiff shit you can now pay double the price to be competitive basket.
Regards Malcolm.
Barry Davies
Posts: 1397
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 232 times

Post by Barry Davies »

They were used at Warrnambool prior to 1st Jan so I guess that means you can do as you like.
Barry Davies
Posts: 1397
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 232 times

Post by Barry Davies »

James Corbett, can you give us an update on the Berger projectiles.
TTBS28
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:27 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by TTBS28 »

Thanks for the input guys. Good to know I'm not the only one concerned that it has not been posted on the site yet i.e. are they legal or aren't they.
Keep it coming - maybe we'll get an answer from somebody. If I get a chance I'll send an email to NRAA and hope to get a reply - maybe tonight?

Regards.............Jeff. Roberts.
MROFD
Posts: 196
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 4:53 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Member Update #36

Post by MROFD »

Here is a copy of the #36 Member Update.
I happened to find a copy of it on the Sanford Rifle Clubs web site.... :?: :?:

Quite interesting that they have managed to lay their hands on a copy, yet the NRAA couldn't :?: :?: :roll:

http://sandfordrifleclub.com.au/wp/wp-c ... ice361.pdf
johnk
Posts: 2211
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:55 pm
Location: Brisbane
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Post by johnk »

Wouldn't the simple answer be to check the distributors, you state rifle association - or have we a little private vendetta going on here?
aaronraad
Posts: 573
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:43 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Has thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by aaronraad »

johnk wrote:Wouldn't the simple answer be to check the distributors, you state rifle association - or have we a little private vendetta going on here?


Even a quick call to the QRA Store just next door the NRAA would be just as accurate. If they're not sure, then what hope do you have of getting a straight answer?

In the mean time...it would seem to be a case of 'when' not 'if' the Berger's will be approved. So if they are available for sale as a 'non-approved' item it won't be stopping other shooters from building stock regardless of pricing.
Be careful what you aim for, you might hit it! Antipodean Industrial - Home of the G7L projectiles
bartman007
Posts: 921
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:06 pm
Location: Gippsland
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 129 times

Bergers

Post by bartman007 »

They were used at Warrnambool prior to 1st Jan


If I had Bergers then I'd probably be using them too, as it seems the events I travel to don't appear to be testing ammo. And I travel to quite a few Vic OPM's.

You can always test the organising committee's resolve to upholding their interpretation of the SSR's, as it doesn't seem to be crystal clear at present.

Does anyone have an UPDATED version of the SSR's? If so, then if the Bergers are documented in there, then they are clearly legal for competition.

I'll continue to use my 155gn Sierra's as they seem to hit the mark. After all I still have 400+ to use up!
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic