Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:39 am
Dave,
One of the M2s had an IR source don't forget.
But yes I agree it doesn't do anything to contradict your findings, or probably the manufacturers claims either. I think the fact that the measurement base of the MSV2 is significantly shorter than the others may be factor in these results.
From what people are saying, my current thoughts are that for portability and use in all light conditions, the MSV2 would be the way to go, but for the best accuracy for measuring velocity variation, then something with more separation between sensors is better.
I now think that the Oehler with 15ft screen separation would be worth investigating!
Alan
One of the M2s had an IR source don't forget.
But yes I agree it doesn't do anything to contradict your findings, or probably the manufacturers claims either. I think the fact that the measurement base of the MSV2 is significantly shorter than the others may be factor in these results.
From what people are saying, my current thoughts are that for portability and use in all light conditions, the MSV2 would be the way to go, but for the best accuracy for measuring velocity variation, then something with more separation between sensors is better.
I now think that the Oehler with 15ft screen separation would be worth investigating!
Alan