Page 2 of 4
Re: NSW queens
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 4:53 pm
by Steve N
Great first day by Josh Reid in FA.
Re: NSW queens
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 5:00 pm
by RDavies
Craig McGowan wrote:That was not the dasher at 600 was it..........58.4 Looking at the scores over the entire field conditions may have been a little tricky?
has anyone managed to get any images of the day.
No, the Dasher hasn't dropped any points lately.
Conditions this afternoon were pretty tricky at the double 600. The wind was constantly from the right averaging around 4 to 5 moa wind with a 7mm, but was picking up and dropping off very rapidly sometimes. Most would have a good run of Xs or 6s, then get a sudden 3 or 4 in either direction. We have been lucky with rain though. It was a very wet drive here this morning with a bleak outlook. Pretty much as soon as the rifles went to the line, the sun came out and the forecaste seems pretty good for the next few days from what I have heard.
Re: NSW queens
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 5:22 pm
by Cameron Mc
RDavies wrote:Craig McGowan wrote:Rod, Rod Rod, 60.9 at the first 300. I bet that 6 was his first sighter.........
.
Yes, the 6 was the sighter I kept with my trusty Dasher. The illusions that I know what I'm doing was dispelled on the last range of the day though.
Just foxing I see Rod
Cam

Re: NSW queens
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 6:15 pm
by plumbs7
Good Shooting Josh ! GS

Re: NSW queens
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 8:17 pm
by DenisA
Second that GS. Great shooting Josh. Highest score for the daily agg over Open and FTR too. Your unbelievable mate!!!!!
Re: NSW queens
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 8:57 pm
by AlanF
Could be a mix of classes in the Calcutta by the looks. Well done Josh! And what about Greg Warrian - that Super count looks ominous.
Re: NSW queens
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:40 pm
by plumbs7
DenisA wrote:Second that GS. Great shooting Josh. Highest score for the daily agg over Open and FTR too. Your unbelievable mate!!!!!
Hey I bet ya can't wait for him to be in F open hey! Lol!
Re: NSW queens
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:53 pm
by AlanF
I'll have you all know that I "discovered" Josh when scoring for him in the NRAA Queens.

Re: NSW queens
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 10:24 pm
by plumbs7
AlanF wrote:I'll have you all know that I "discovered" Josh when scoring for him in the NRAA Queens.

Lol!
No , no he was my nemesis first ! Lol!
Struth we sound like a bunch of groupies !

Re: NSW queens
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 10:27 pm
by plumbs7
Now can I have an Autograph Josh! Lol!
Re: NSW queens
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 6:53 am
by shooter mcreid
Ah you boys crack me up!
I would like to thank the Canberra guys who I'm sharing a room with as they have made me feel very welcome. So thanks Dave, tony, cedrick and dan.
The wind at this place is crazy, I don't think I have experienced it before.
Re: NSW queens
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 8:07 am
by johnk
shooter mcreid wrote:The wind at this place is crazy, I don't think I have experienced it before.
It's probably blowing out of some politicians' butts & you know how they blow hot & cold.

Re: NSW queens
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:17 pm
by bartman007
Well Alan, better put money down on that Rod Davies fellow, looks like he had a healthy start in the leadup.
I see Mr Paroz is lurking around there too. Lets have a look at tomorrows field, where we should see some of the locals come out to play. I wonder if a home town advantage can get Matt / Ben or some of the other locals to give that Davies fellow a scare.
We know that leading Rod astray won't nobble him, and even his own attempts to damage scopes won't nobble him, so the question is: WHAT WILL?
I guess you guy's need to pull the finger out and just shoot better
Pity I'm not there to have a play too. I mentioned it to the missus that I was heading north tonight, and she said WHAT! I took by the tone of it that I wouldn't be joining you guys and gals this time round

Re: NSW queens
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:53 pm
by johnk
Something has gone feral with the NRAA software. How can you have aggregate values higher than the sum of the individual matches? 420 should be F possible score; 350 for TR.
Re: NSW queens
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 4:05 pm
by AlanF
johnk wrote:Something has gone feral with the NRAA software. How can you have aggregate values higher than the sum of the individual matches? 420 should be F possible score; 350 for TR.
Looks like most, but not all have shot the 2nd 800, and the agg shows them as soon as entered. Will all come out in the wash. Maybe TR have been delayed by (wait for it) the ETs

.