Re: Is it time for a change
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2021 12:38 pm
For me the real issue here is why does the NRAA still want to control what bullets are being used ??
They dropped the "bullet tax" and charged us more to cover the loss and then still tell us what we can use. Once the bullet tax went, the ICFRA projectile rules should have been adopted.
The Board is there to look after the Shareholders interest, the Shareholders are the STA's. The STA's need to get together and tell the Board they want (for example to go with less the 156 grains as per ICFRA). There has been a few changes of late that didn't follow the correct process.
The tail is wagging the dog, it's time the dog sat on the tail !!!
Matt P
They dropped the "bullet tax" and charged us more to cover the loss and then still tell us what we can use. Once the bullet tax went, the ICFRA projectile rules should have been adopted.
The Board is there to look after the Shareholders interest, the Shareholders are the STA's. The STA's need to get together and tell the Board they want (for example to go with less the 156 grains as per ICFRA). There has been a few changes of late that didn't follow the correct process.
The tail is wagging the dog, it's time the dog sat on the tail !!!
Matt P