Page 3 of 4
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 1:35 pm
by Barry Davies
And the two barrels ( one for A and one for B ) were awarded to 1st and 2nd in A grade and the 1st in B grade missed out.
Correct me if I am wrong. Something wrong there?
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 1:43 pm
by AlanF
Barry Davies wrote:And the two barrels ( one for A and one for B ) were awarded to 1st and 2nd in A grade and the 1st in B grade missed out.
Correct me if I am wrong. Something wrong there?
What I thought happened was that the winners of division 1 (B Pederson) and 2 (S Sharp) each won a barrel , and the overall winner (S Sharp) got first badge?
Alan
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:07 pm
by Barry Davies
The final result clearly shows Grading ( not divisions )
Sharp -B grade( but top score overall ) elevated to A grade. Pederson top in A grade but relegated to 2nd --both win barrels. Halloran 2nd in B grade then elevated to 1st in B grade ---badge only.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:21 pm
by bartman007
I see your point Barry.
If you are second, then you shouldn't get a barrel!
So really Sharp won the F Class event, and gets a Barrel.
Pederson gets a 2nd Badge for FA.
Halloran FB 2nd place getter actually gets FB 1st Badge and a Barrel.
And everyone else in FB goes up one rung on the ladder in the Badges.
That sounds fair, sorry Bob
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:27 pm
by Barry Davies
Hi Mike,
No! Pederson and Sharp got the barrels, Halloran got a badge only ( no barrel ) otherwise you got it correct.
And everyone else in FA goes down a rung.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:41 pm
by AlanF
Barry Davies wrote:The final result clearly shows Grading ( not divisions )
Sharp -B grade( but top score overall ) elevated to A grade. Pederson top in A grade but relegated to 2nd --both win barrels. Halloran 2nd in B grade then elevated to 1st in B grade ---badge only.
My comment stands.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:46 pm
by Barry Davies
In the same comp. -- Queens 3rd stage
Trindall - A Grade --116.06
Halloran - B grade -- 117.05
Halloran did not win A grade over Trindall --why?
Seems like double standards to me.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:40 pm
by TOM
Based on that, could an entrant in F standard who tops the score of F open be elevated to the number one spot in FO, After all, F open is the pinnacle of the F classes... Isn't it?
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:45 pm
by Barry Davies
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:59 pm
by johnk
2.2.3.6 A Competitor may only enter one Grade or one Class of Competition in any single competition. The following are examples:-
(a) A competitor cannot enter in both a TR Class and an F Class in the same competition.
(b) A competitor cannot enter both F Standard and F Open in the same competition.
(c) A competitor cannot enter in more than one Grade in the same competition.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:24 pm
by bruce moulds
but a b or c grade tr shooter can win a queens.
if b grade, they would also win the b grade event, which with all other events at a queens, one of the side matches.
(unless they are automatically upgraded, but i don't think that kicks in until their next comp)
keep safe,
bruce.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:55 pm
by Barry Davies
If 2.2.3.6c is to be upheld, how then can a competitor take prizes from two grades?
Barry
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:35 pm
by mike H
What Alan said is correct. Earlier I should have said division one and division two,not A and B grade.Steve,because he fired the highest score of all the F/class standard competitors,rightly was presented with the number one badge,all other prizes were awarded according to the division you were entered in.
Mike.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 9:27 pm
by Chopper
OK, Back to the question, if you want to get chaired in with the pipes Why ? because TR does , Why ? Chop.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:12 pm
by AlanF
When you have a great victory, you are honoured by being raised high. Similar ceremonies happen in many sports. Its better than what happens to the Sydney Hobart winners.
