Page 6 of 6

Re: Nraa queens

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:04 pm
by Matt P
LoneRider wrote:great work guys and gals....
where did nick from the gemfields rifle club place ?
was norm there or just nick ?

as for the magazine...i would get it,but that would make club membership over $200 a yr [or very close too] cant afford that...

$200 a year, you've got it good !!!!!!
Mines $500.

Re: Nraa queens

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:06 pm
by LoneRider
thats without ssaa...
my club is only 50 but qra/nraa makes up the rest :x

Re: Nraa queens

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 6:25 pm
by AlanF
Communication is not a strong point of our sport - losing the ATR will only make it worse. If the magazine folds, the main ones affected will be those without internet access, mostly older TR and F-Std shooters. It'll be up to clubs to keep these shooters informed - maybe each "offline" member can be teamed up with someone who has the internet.

Re: Nraa queens

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:02 pm
by scott/r
Just a thought for the ATR magazine. Why can't it be put on news stands beside the ssaa magazine. As I said on a different thread (before I realized I had it in the wrong place) with the magazine being in the news agencies, it may even go towards bringing new interests to the sport. I also know that I would have bought extra copies while waiting for the mrs at shopping centers.

Re: Nraa queens

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:49 pm
by LoneRider
$87 for ssaa with a magazine subscription.
$130 odd for qra/nraa and more for the mag.... :roll:
they would get more subscriptions if we actually got something for our money...

Re: Nraa queens

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:29 pm
by AlanF
LoneRider wrote:$87 for ssaa with a magazine subscription.
$130 odd for qra/nraa and more for the mag.... :roll:
they would get more subscriptions if we actually got something for our money...

The magazine relies on article contributions from members for its content. As a QRA member, you have to take responsibility for its failings along with the rest of us.

Re: Nraa queens

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:34 pm
by johnk
I was just thinking along those lines, Alan.

I reported our Queens (and the ASG while it was viable) from 1997 to 2014, at which time I just ran out of inspiration, but I was just thinking that one or two of the technical threads that pop up here could be polished into an article. Maybe somebody could write a Dorothy Dixer type Q & A article monthly.

Re: Nraa queens

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:01 pm
by LoneRider
AlanF wrote:
LoneRider wrote:$87 for ssaa with a magazine subscription.
$130 odd for qra/nraa and more for the mag.... :roll:
they would get more subscriptions if we actually got something for our money...

The magazine relies on article contributions from members for its content. As a QRA member, you have to take responsibility for its failings along with the rest of us.

thats got nothing to do with what i am saying allan.
but thats not to say...what your saying isnt valid.
maybe more older shooters could pass on what they have gleaned over the decades.
and get it as a regular contribution in the mag....
less corporate lunches would help lower costs aswell. :wink:

Re: Nraa queens

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:43 am
by jasmay
John,

Do you know any contact details, I just used this address copied from the NRAA website atr_editorial@www.nraa.com.au and got a delivery failure.

I am interested in assisting with articles and advertising with them.

Would people be interested in membership if we had a dedicated f-class writer? I'd be happy to cover articles of interest to people also.

I'd like to see this magazine live on, I think its an important part of our sport.

Re: Nraa queens

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:45 am
by jasmay
Never mind, I found the address elsewhere, not a good start if on the ATR page on the NRAA site the ONLY email contact is wrong..... :shock:

Link to wrong info page https://www.nraa.com.au/atr-magazine/

I have emailed the NRAA to correct it