MAB built OMARK 44R reliability
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 7:18 pm
Hey guys.
Chasing some info from people who may have had and shot the later MAB built OMARK actions.
I have a 1988 built M.A.B 44R with a current MAB adaptor. Its had very little work and is in really good condition.
With so much opinion on the older actions im interested in hearing from those who have successfully shot them with good result. I am also looking to dispel some myths surrounding the action which i know is not as refined as the modern offerings.
1. Can the action/adaptor itself handle the pressure of modern FTR large for caliber projectiles. I am looking to shoot a 200.20X in FTR with a 1/10 30-32" cut rifle barrel. I cant seem to find any load data specifically on the ADI site for a 200.20X Berger but the pressure for a 200gr soft point at max charge isn't that much higher than a 155 at full noise. Also i would assume the test rifle and barrel for the ADI data is not throated for the bigger projectiles and case fill/max load numbers are possibly on the lighter side.
2. Aside from the unrefined feel, is there anything significant im missing that would make the action a bad prospect for an FTR rifle.
Thanks in advance.
Chasing some info from people who may have had and shot the later MAB built OMARK actions.
I have a 1988 built M.A.B 44R with a current MAB adaptor. Its had very little work and is in really good condition.
With so much opinion on the older actions im interested in hearing from those who have successfully shot them with good result. I am also looking to dispel some myths surrounding the action which i know is not as refined as the modern offerings.
1. Can the action/adaptor itself handle the pressure of modern FTR large for caliber projectiles. I am looking to shoot a 200.20X in FTR with a 1/10 30-32" cut rifle barrel. I cant seem to find any load data specifically on the ADI site for a 200.20X Berger but the pressure for a 200gr soft point at max charge isn't that much higher than a 155 at full noise. Also i would assume the test rifle and barrel for the ADI data is not throated for the bigger projectiles and case fill/max load numbers are possibly on the lighter side.
2. Aside from the unrefined feel, is there anything significant im missing that would make the action a bad prospect for an FTR rifle.
Thanks in advance.