Rail and Ring Heights for Savage F/tr and Nightforce 8-32 BR
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:45 pm
Hi all,
I am ordering the bits for my first competition setup for F-Class standard.
I have on order a Savage F/TR 308 and a Nightforce 8-32 Bench Rest Scope.
I have ordered rail and want to order my rings. I want to use a EGW rail (ordered) and Night Force Rings (not ordered).
The EGW rail I Have ordered is the HD F-Class mount (there is also a non-HD F-Class mount) I have heard that the "HD Version is 0.350 inch top of rail to top of receiver.
If this is so then I have calculated from what info I can find on the net and dimensions of the scope also found on the net that I would need Nightforce 1.265 rings (base of ring to centreline of scope). This is their "High" Mount. I have allowed and extra 2.4mm at the objective because of the 20MOA rail. If all my asumptions are correct then I should have a clearance at the objective of about 5.1mm plus the reduction in barel diameter at that point. I suspect that I could come down to the 1.123 inch (medium) mount.
This is the part number of the rail:
80322 "HD F-Class Savage Round Back Short Action Picatinny Rail Scope Mount 20MOA
Can any one with a similar setup give may some advice as to if this is too high or low and if I have the dimension of the rail(s) correct.
Some where it was mentioned that the HD F-Class EGW rail was 0.350 and the standard EGW F-class rail was 0.450
Could I get away with the medium mount if the rail is 0.350?
I am ordering the bits for my first competition setup for F-Class standard.
I have on order a Savage F/TR 308 and a Nightforce 8-32 Bench Rest Scope.
I have ordered rail and want to order my rings. I want to use a EGW rail (ordered) and Night Force Rings (not ordered).
The EGW rail I Have ordered is the HD F-Class mount (there is also a non-HD F-Class mount) I have heard that the "HD Version is 0.350 inch top of rail to top of receiver.
If this is so then I have calculated from what info I can find on the net and dimensions of the scope also found on the net that I would need Nightforce 1.265 rings (base of ring to centreline of scope). This is their "High" Mount. I have allowed and extra 2.4mm at the objective because of the 20MOA rail. If all my asumptions are correct then I should have a clearance at the objective of about 5.1mm plus the reduction in barel diameter at that point. I suspect that I could come down to the 1.123 inch (medium) mount.
This is the part number of the rail:
80322 "HD F-Class Savage Round Back Short Action Picatinny Rail Scope Mount 20MOA
Can any one with a similar setup give may some advice as to if this is too high or low and if I have the dimension of the rail(s) correct.
Some where it was mentioned that the HD F-Class EGW rail was 0.350 and the standard EGW F-class rail was 0.450
Could I get away with the medium mount if the rail is 0.350?