Page 1 of 1
Forster Coax, are they really all that?
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 6:13 am
by jasmay
I currently use a Harrels press, I came from a redding turret, I really like the Harrels.
I hear so many shooters raving on about the Forster but to look at them they just seem like clunkers, are they really that good?
Re: Forster Coax, are they really all that?
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:06 am
by chrisw91
I love mine would have any thing else as my main press now.
Re: Forster Coax, are they really all that?
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:27 am
by DenisA
Jas, I have a Forster Co-Axe and a Lyman single stage. I use a free floating technique with the dies and the bushes. I can get the same low neck concentricity from the Lyman that I do from the Forster.
The Forster handle being so high is a different feel that takes a little getting use to.
I enjoy using the Forster more because it's an open design which allows me to flow a little better makes process' a little faster.
It doesn't size brass or seat bullets any better than my Lyman does.
Re: Forster Coax, are they really all that?
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:36 am
by 6.5x55ai
Friend has one - seems one its main features is the ability to do quick die changes. His is a very old model and there are issues fitting the longer Redding Comp dies. My 40 yr old RCBS produces ammo as good as his.
Re: Forster Coax, are they really all that?
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:40 am
by jasmay
Thanks guys, I was thinking of experimenting, but I am very happy with my current setup and from what's been said sounds like there is no more to be achieved from having one.
Re: Forster Coax, are they really all that?
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 2:22 pm
by seb
Jason, I have a compact loading press (a prototype) that I used during the WBC 2103 in Sidney - you'll get it when you receive my stuffs from Stuart.
It works for ppc up to 30.06 & some magnum cases.
Might not give you more straighter rounds, it's just fancy with the bling factor. It's slick,too.
Should work for .308 easily.
seb.
Re: Forster Coax, are they really all that?
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 2:43 pm
by aaronraad
For the money I'd buy a Walnut Hill press.
Completely impractical for daily use, but no one questions if you're serious about reloading when they see it on your bench. A bit like the Merc Unimog of single stage presses. Not quite the Abrams tank that the Mega-Mite is, but you still avoid sitting in their blind spot.
Did we decide that floating a die with an o-ring was okay alternative?
Re: Forster Coax, are they really all that?
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 6:34 am
by 6.5x55ai
aaronraad wrote:For the money I'd buy a Walnut Hill press.
Completely impractical for daily use, but no one questions if you're serious about reloading when they see it on your bench. A bit like the Merc Unimog of single stage presses. Not quite the Abrams tank that the Mega-Mite is, but you still avoid sitting in their blind spot.
Be akin to opening a walnut with a sledgehammer and man they are ugly (beauty in the eye of the beholder?).

Re: Forster Coax, are they really all that?
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:14 am
by johnk
Any press that can accommodate a Lee lock ring is a good start. Better is if the calibre I'm using has a Lee collet die available.
Re: Forster Coax, are they really all that?
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 10:16 pm
by RAVEN
I have a CH 444X can set up 4 dies plus my powder thrower works for me
RB
