Palma versus LR brass Revisited
Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 6:06 pm
I have recently carried out a comparative test of small rifle CCI Bench rest and CCI 450 Magnum small rifle in my 223Rem F Std rifle with the following results
..….......BR ..MAG
1……….. 2888 2917
2……….. 2891 2923
3……….. 2912 2927
4……….. 2913 2935
5……….. 2920 2941
6……….. 2920 2942
MV MAX 2920 2942
MV MIN. 2888 2917 GAIN
ES………. 32 ...25 ...22%
AVE... 2907 ..2931 .24 ..0.8%
Whereas the statistical base is small the exercise was conducted within an hour under good condition at 3 minute intervals between shots and the results are consistent with those found by other 223REM target shooters.
So my question is. wouldn't it be reasonable to expect a similar improvement using Lapua BR 308 Cases?
Before going out and buying 100 308 BR Lapua cases I would like to know if anyone else has tried this and measured a worthwhile improvement to ES/MV
Thanks
Peter
..….......BR ..MAG
1……….. 2888 2917
2……….. 2891 2923
3……….. 2912 2927
4……….. 2913 2935
5……….. 2920 2941
6……….. 2920 2942
MV MAX 2920 2942
MV MIN. 2888 2917 GAIN
ES………. 32 ...25 ...22%
AVE... 2907 ..2931 .24 ..0.8%
Whereas the statistical base is small the exercise was conducted within an hour under good condition at 3 minute intervals between shots and the results are consistent with those found by other 223REM target shooters.
So my question is. wouldn't it be reasonable to expect a similar improvement using Lapua BR 308 Cases?
Before going out and buying 100 308 BR Lapua cases I would like to know if anyone else has tried this and measured a worthwhile improvement to ES/MV
Thanks
Peter