y!
Moderator: Mod
-
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:01 am
- Location: Woodend, Victoria
G'day all,
it would seem a great shame to ban people from a forum who have so much technical advice to offer. I admit I want to 'let fly" occaisionally, however, you've got to learn to step back from the keyboard, take a deep breath and focus and attack the points made, particularly if the point is weak or technically wrong ..............not the people making it.
Too many forum members from all sides getting too personal and by doing so they undermine their own argument/point.
What ever happened to free speach?
Whatever happened to being polite?
If they other guy/girl isn't listening to the argument/point then let your rifle do your talking, have the satisfaction of your Fclass results hammer home the nails in the other guys arguement!
Otherwise take to watching Monty python!!! works for me!!!
Cheerio Ned
it would seem a great shame to ban people from a forum who have so much technical advice to offer. I admit I want to 'let fly" occaisionally, however, you've got to learn to step back from the keyboard, take a deep breath and focus and attack the points made, particularly if the point is weak or technically wrong ..............not the people making it.
Too many forum members from all sides getting too personal and by doing so they undermine their own argument/point.
What ever happened to free speach?
Whatever happened to being polite?
If they other guy/girl isn't listening to the argument/point then let your rifle do your talking, have the satisfaction of your Fclass results hammer home the nails in the other guys arguement!
Otherwise take to watching Monty python!!! works for me!!!
Cheerio Ned
-
- Posts: 7499
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm
- Location: Maffra, Vic
As a.JR has decided to give a distorted version of the PM I sent to him, here it is :
I apologise that this is being aired publicly, but misinformation tends to stick if it isn't challenged.
Alan
Jeff,
Here's where I stand on BR :
1. I don't want the character of F-Class changed towards BR (benches, extremely heavy guns, shooting for groups). Anyone who wants that has the choice to shoot BR! F-Open needs to offer something different - otherwise why have it?!!!
2. I have met numerous BR shooters at F-Class shoots and on my home range over the last 12 months, all good people, and I welcome their participation in F-Class, using equipment that conforms to F-Class rules!
3. I'd like to have a go at LG at a BR meeting one day, hence the GENUINE suggestion that a third day of a one gun event at Canberra could be BR. However, F-Open will almost certainly remain my preferred category. If that is a problem for you, then I can't help you.
Your repeated false accusations against me and others are lowering the standard of discussion on the ozfclass.com forums. If you keep behaving as you are, I regret to say that you will be banned. Your continued membership of the forums is in your hands.
Alan
I apologise that this is being aired publicly, but misinformation tends to stick if it isn't challenged.
Alan
-
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:01 am
- Location: Woodend, Victoria
G'day all,
Deep breath time again .....hopefully for everyone!
I am in no way taking sides but in some small way attempting to take some of the heat out of the forum. As a rule I always re-read what I've written for spelling mistakes and to see if it really says what I'm trying to say. Hopefully everyone can take a little from this and apply it to their own way of making posts
As I've said before, I am a BR shooter when I sit at a bench and am a FO shooter when I lay down on the firing mound. As are all the FO/BR shooters I have met in my years of competition.
I think any who reads this will understand the fundamental difference, you are who you are depending on the match and target you are about to shoot. I'm sure that anyone who does not comply with the appropriate rule book will find out quickly enough.
Enough from me on this thread.
Cheerio Ned
Deep breath time again .....hopefully for everyone!
I am in no way taking sides but in some small way attempting to take some of the heat out of the forum. As a rule I always re-read what I've written for spelling mistakes and to see if it really says what I'm trying to say. Hopefully everyone can take a little from this and apply it to their own way of making posts
As I've said before, I am a BR shooter when I sit at a bench and am a FO shooter when I lay down on the firing mound. As are all the FO/BR shooters I have met in my years of competition.
I think any who reads this will understand the fundamental difference, you are who you are depending on the match and target you are about to shoot. I'm sure that anyone who does not comply with the appropriate rule book will find out quickly enough.
Enough from me on this thread.
Cheerio Ned
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests