bruce moulds wrote:my instinct would be to go for 6.00 o'clock.
bruce.
Of coarse it would !!
Moderator: Mod
bruce moulds wrote:my instinct would be to go for 6.00 o'clock.
bruce.
bruce moulds wrote:my instinct would be to go for 6.00 o'clock.
bruce.
KHGS wrote:I actually prefer "straight" barrels , many of these do exist by the way, much, much more than 20 years ago. With this talk of indexing, no one has mentioned what to do with straight barrels, how do you all "index" them, just askin . I have seen very few Maddco or Bartlien barrels that do not run true. Krieger not so much, but very good in their larger profiles. Swan parallel barrels are very straight. The quality of the barrel is paramount, but this is of no value if the 'smith does not do a good job. "A good barrel will not work if the 'smith does not do it justice" conversely " a good 'smith will not make a bad barrel shoot well". These are the observations of an elderly practical gun smith for what they are worth.
Keith H.
Wal86 wrote:IMO if the barrel is that bad you have to index it, you don't put the f@#king reamer in..
There are more important issues to get right that are detrimental to accuracy, indexing is a long long long long way back on the list..
Gyro wrote:All good Wal, I’ll just go and find a concrete wall to head butt now. Maybe Coronation Street is on tonite ….. alas.
Return to “Equipment & Technical”
Users browsing this forum: GMac and 81 guests