ar 2213sc
Moderator: Mod
-
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:07 pm
ar 2213sc
has anyone noticed an increase in black fouling with newer lots of 2213sc.
i cannot say absolutely, but i feel that i am having to do a lot more cleaning lately to get out carbon.
i fouled out at a recent prize shoot, and have never done that before.
bruce moulds.
i cannot say absolutely, but i feel that i am having to do a lot more cleaning lately to get out carbon.
i fouled out at a recent prize shoot, and have never done that before.
bruce moulds.
"SUCH IS LIFE" Edward Kelly 11 nov 1880
http://youtu.be/YRaRCCZjdTM
http://youtu.be/YRaRCCZjdTM
-
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:07 pm
hi bat,
what you say has been my general experience over the years.
but this is different. the higher the charge, the more stubborn the fouling becomes to remove.
lower charges give plenty of it, but it comes out pretty easily. higher charges make fouling that bonds to the bore like solder.
up until recently this didn't happen with 13sc.
bruce.
what you say has been my general experience over the years.
but this is different. the higher the charge, the more stubborn the fouling becomes to remove.
lower charges give plenty of it, but it comes out pretty easily. higher charges make fouling that bonds to the bore like solder.
up until recently this didn't happen with 13sc.
bruce.
-
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:30 am
- Location: Adelaide
bruce moulds wrote:hi bat,
what you say has been my general experience over the years.
but this is different. the higher the charge, the more stubborn the fouling becomes to remove.
lower charges give plenty of it, but it comes out pretty easily. higher charges make fouling that bonds to the bore like solder.
up until recently this didn't happen with 13sc.
bruce.
Bruce I'm using it as my fave 284S powder and have very little fouling and its easily cleaned out. I found this to be the case on both my 7mm barrels with powder lot MEM4647. I am about to change to powder lot MEM4810 and will let you know if its any different.
What powder lot are you having problems with?
Ian
-
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:07 pm
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Corryong
Bruce the main dif between 4647 that i just ran out of, and the new batch 4810 was the speed and perhaps a bit dirtier. with 4810 i picked up another 50 f/sec which pissed me off as i was getting vert , so back to the croney to load develope again that was when i discovered the speed and ES dif between the new and old ..
-
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:07 pm
-
- Posts: 7501
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm
- Location: Maffra, Vic
-
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:07 pm
-
- Posts: 2323
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 7:23 pm
- Location: Singleton NSW
I have heard some North QLDers not liking 2213SC during humid conditions as it was supposed to build up hard carbon fouling. I would say the temperatures where you are might not be as high as in North QLD in the wet season, but I wonder if the damp winter air might be causing fouling problems with some ingrediant in this powder???
-
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:07 pm
since the last report,the low node of 53 gn has proven not to foul badly.
moving up a node to 55.2 gn has repeated its bad tendancy. wonderfully accurate for the first range, then elevation next range.
the first wet patch down the barrel felt like it was going through a bit of 80 grit abrasive, and a lot of cleaning required to smooth it up.
luckily a ladder using 2209 produced a good node over a range of 1.2 gn, so we'll see if that is a better deal.
bruce.
moving up a node to 55.2 gn has repeated its bad tendancy. wonderfully accurate for the first range, then elevation next range.
the first wet patch down the barrel felt like it was going through a bit of 80 grit abrasive, and a lot of cleaning required to smooth it up.
luckily a ladder using 2209 produced a good node over a range of 1.2 gn, so we'll see if that is a better deal.
bruce.
-
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:07 pm
the 2209 node proved to be a good one.
after shooting 2 ranges, the first wet one down the bore felt quite normal, and the barrel cleaned up well.
of interest is that boretech eliminator had been ourchased out of desperation and was used this time.
when cleaned as per instructions, the barrel looked clean and felt clean.
a check with hoppes no 9 (10 strokes with a bronze brush) however, revealed black krud.
this is by no means a criticism of boretech, as i had not anointed the bore and stored it as per instruction, which might get out that last bit.
it does however illustrate the fact that " old fashioned hoppes" is still a very effective product.
next step is to see how tis barrel settles down from clean.
beuce.
after shooting 2 ranges, the first wet one down the bore felt quite normal, and the barrel cleaned up well.
of interest is that boretech eliminator had been ourchased out of desperation and was used this time.
when cleaned as per instructions, the barrel looked clean and felt clean.
a check with hoppes no 9 (10 strokes with a bronze brush) however, revealed black krud.
this is by no means a criticism of boretech, as i had not anointed the bore and stored it as per instruction, which might get out that last bit.
it does however illustrate the fact that " old fashioned hoppes" is still a very effective product.
next step is to see how tis barrel settles down from clean.
beuce.
-
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:07 pm
bat,
no but i have some gunslick foaming cleaner from the sara store which is similar. it is very good in that it saves a lot of rubbing of the bore - more of a soaker.
i put it down a very old badly fouled bore once, and the first foam out the muzzle was already blue. very effective on both carbon & copper.
the point i make is that no solvent is absolute.
one will almost always get out stuff when another does no more.
saw a test recently where ballistol dissolved more jacket copper than sweets over a 24 hr period. so much for the sweets legend.
bruce.
no but i have some gunslick foaming cleaner from the sara store which is similar. it is very good in that it saves a lot of rubbing of the bore - more of a soaker.
i put it down a very old badly fouled bore once, and the first foam out the muzzle was already blue. very effective on both carbon & copper.
the point i make is that no solvent is absolute.
one will almost always get out stuff when another does no more.
saw a test recently where ballistol dissolved more jacket copper than sweets over a 24 hr period. so much for the sweets legend.
bruce.
Return to “Equipment & Technical”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests