A-MAx

Get or give advice on equipment, reloading and other technical issues.

Moderator: Mod

Message
Author
saum2
Posts: 1049
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:22 am

A-MAx

#1 Postby saum2 » Sun Aug 07, 2011 5:09 pm

Anyone had any success with any new batches of .224 x 80Gn A-max projectiles?? or is barrel twist/combination more important??

Geoff

Malcolm Hill
Posts: 329
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:40 pm
Location: Mid North S.A.

#2 Postby Malcolm Hill » Sun Aug 07, 2011 6:22 pm

Geoff
There are some Amax's around that seem to be behaving themselves again after some previous batches that had problems with fliers that would go anywhere out into the 4 ring. I've been using them again for about four or five months and have used about 1200 in a couple of rifles without any problems. They have been working well even at the long ranges and are grouping as well as they used to when they were first made legal. Put down a 60.9 the other day in a team shoot and only lost one by a whisker. I'm still using the same barrel as when I was having problems with the earlier batches so nothing has changed equipment wise.
Regards Malcolm.

RDavies
Posts: 2323
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 7:23 pm
Location: Singleton NSW

#3 Postby RDavies » Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:16 pm

So, is it a case of the 1st batches were good, then they were bad for a while, but back to being good now?

Malcolm Hill
Posts: 329
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:40 pm
Location: Mid North S.A.

#4 Postby Malcolm Hill » Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:35 pm

Just prior to and after the Amax was approved they were of excellent quality and no one had any problems getting them to shoot. After they were approved and started to get used in larger numbers people started to have issues with fliers and numerous enquiries to Hornady went unanswered. I think that maybe the larger demand was met at the expense of quality and it wasn't long before a lot of shooters (myself included) went back to using the Sierra's because they were sick of the problem. Sales of the Amax must have dropped off enough for the problem to be addressed as some of the later batches seem to be back to behaving themselves. I've used a couple of boxes of later projectiles with none of the flier problems that were quite consistent with some earlier lots.
Regards Malcolm.

saum2
Posts: 1049
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:22 am

A-max

#5 Postby saum2 » Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:46 pm

thanks for the info, any particular batch numbers working well??
Geoff

RDavies
Posts: 2323
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 7:23 pm
Location: Singleton NSW

#6 Postby RDavies » Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:41 pm

What twist are the people who have them working well using? Will 8" be reliable?

justinp
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:42 pm

#7 Postby justinp » Tue Aug 16, 2011 6:55 pm

I'm about to try some through a new 7.5"benchmark

I've noticed that the 100 I've just bough have has about .004" ES in base-to-ogive length, which was far better than the .015" ES of the crappy bulk batch that the associations procured and which produce outrageous fliers. Still not up to Nosler standards for ES (those 80gr Noslers are VERY consistent) but we'll see how they shoot.

I've got a longer throat in this time (0.150"), will try them seated into the lands a little.

You might want to check the seater stems on your seating dies. I've noticed that with the standard seating stems on both wilson, redding and forster seaters, the tip of the 80 max touches the top of the tube before the bearing surface - therefore you'd be seating by pushing the projectile in from the tip..recipe for disaster. I've got a VLD stem for my redding comp seater.

saum2
Posts: 1049
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:22 am

#8 Postby saum2 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:11 pm

I've found that 8 twist is ok for sierras only in my last barrel, new barrel- 7.5 twist shoots both Sierras & A-max quite well.

johnk
Posts: 2211
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:55 pm
Location: Brisbane

#9 Postby johnk » Wed Aug 31, 2011 8:16 am

I was talking to a friend last night. Three shooters in his area (he included) have rebarrelled recently & none of them can get the previously superior Amaxes to shoot. Two of the three are using the same manufacturer's barrels with the same spec, but interestingly all three are using original stock pre-hologram box projectiles.

Maybe the little buggers are just finicky.

saum2
Posts: 1049
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:22 am

#10 Postby saum2 » Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:28 pm

Perhaps we should push for the 6BR to replace the .223Rem. then we wouldn't have the projectile problems????

johnk
Posts: 2211
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:55 pm
Location: Brisbane

#11 Postby johnk » Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:31 pm

...and the .308 with the .30 WSSM?

AlanF
Posts: 7501
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Maffra, Vic

#12 Postby AlanF » Wed Aug 31, 2011 5:46 pm

...and F-Open could be limited to .223 and 308? :shock:

John E
Posts: 1015
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

#13 Postby John E » Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:50 pm

Is there something going on between Krakey and Ned?
By the way, congratulations to Ned on winning the MDRA Champ of Champs last Saturday, supposedly with his 223.

John

macguru
Posts: 1627
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am

#14 Postby macguru » Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:43 pm

Is anyone using a .303 in f standard ? You could try a ruger #1 :)

saum2
Posts: 1049
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:22 am

#15 Postby saum2 » Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:50 pm

no your right, 6mm wouldn't be competitive back at 1000yds


Return to “Equipment & Technical”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 136 guests