.308 or .307 ???

Get or give advice on equipment, reloading and other technical issues.

Moderator: Mod

Message
Author
BC
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:41 pm

.308 or .307 ???

#1 Postby BC » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:01 pm

Pretty soon I need to have the .308 barrel on my rifle changed. There are quite a few barrels with a .307 calibre on the market. Does anyone know what the pros and cons are of these barrels.

Thanks

BC

Brad Y
Posts: 2181
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:21 pm

#2 Postby Brad Y » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:40 pm

My barrel is a 0.298" x .3065" krieger. Im not a big fan of it- it produced alot of copper to start with and has been finicky with loads. One minute it seems brilliant, the next I scratch my head a little. Its going to be relegated to hunting and varmint duties soon. Next one will be .300"x.308"- supposed to be a winner.

johnk
Posts: 2211
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:55 pm
Location: Brisbane

#3 Postby johnk » Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:18 pm

If you're talking about the .308 W calibre, I've got my best results from the larger diameters - a .300/.308 Kreiger & a Maddco, similarly generous. I was looking at the Kreiger only a week or so ago. I pulled it out after 5½ thousand rounds before I did Bendigo for the first F class teams. It still looks sharp & clean and was shooting perfectly before I retired it.

aaronraad
Posts: 573
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:43 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Re: .308 or .307 ???

#4 Postby aaronraad » Mon Mar 04, 2013 10:45 pm

BC wrote:Pretty soon I need to have the .308 barrel on my rifle changed. There are quite a few barrels with a .307 calibre on the market. Does anyone know what the pros and cons are of these barrels.

Thanks

BC


Great for swaging down projectiles and stressing thin jackets. I think it had a role to play when shooting FMJ military projectiles? If you're keen I think there is still merit in the German squeeze bore concept.
Be careful what you aim for, you might hit it! Antipodean Industrial - Home of the G7L projectiles

Triplejim
Posts: 598
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:48 pm

#5 Postby Triplejim » Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:42 pm

Brad Y wrote:My barrel is a 0.298" x .3065" krieger.

The .3065" groove size worked well when we used ADI 144 which often measured .3072".

BC
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:41 pm

#6 Postby BC » Tue Mar 05, 2013 7:31 pm

My current barrel is a True Flite .308 and I am using the Sierra 155gr projectiles. I like this barrel but I was wondering if I can improve my scores with a .307 barrel and still using the Sierra 155gr.

Triplejim
Posts: 598
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:48 pm

#7 Postby Triplejim » Tue Mar 05, 2013 7:44 pm

BC wrote:My current barrel is a True Flite .308

As a general rule for 30 cal 155g, we order our barrels in 307 4G, 3075 5R and 308 6G. (Lapping adds ~.0002")
The idea is to keep the length displacement of the bullet to within certain parameters.

jcinsa
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:59 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills

#8 Postby jcinsa » Tue Mar 05, 2013 7:50 pm

Jim,

what do your barrel codes 4G, 5R, and 6G denote ?

Thanks

John
Argue with a fool, and all the casual observer will see is two fools arguing.

Triplejim
Posts: 598
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:48 pm

#9 Postby Triplejim » Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:01 pm

4 Groove, 5 R-form, 6 Groove have a read of
http://obermeyerbarrels.com/faq.html


Return to “Equipment & Technical”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests