FIVE 60s IN A ROW

DaveMc · Post by **DaveMc** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 5:36 pm

I have finally got the hybrids shooting as well Alan (pretty worried for a while)and basically same velocity as yours. First two barrels didn't like em but new Truflite seems to. Nice to have that sort of BC isn't it! Bodes well for you having two exceptional barrels going for FCWC. Great news.

ps we also have a couple of guys now in our club that can also join the 2* "Shoulda cut the sixes" club (although one of mine was a 60.8 followed by 2 more for 10). Marty and I have now made a deal to cut em in club days (but not OPM's or queens). A bit of a " I will if you do" situation. Since doing the deal neither of us have got that close though. A few others seem to be cottoning on now and doing same. It seems a much more common phenomenon (not saying it is easy by any means) to just miss the first one or two then get onto it. A lot harder to manage 10 in a row from cold bore shot though so we figure the likelihood of a 60.10 coming from cut sighters is far greater than from straight off the bat. More to the point you can't get one if you keep a 6.

Cameron Mc · Post by **Cameron Mc** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:28 pm

DaveMc wrote: Marty and I have now made a deal to cut em in club days (but not OPM's or queens). A few others seem to be cottoningh on and doing same.

Dave, is this a NQ stratergy for the Team Shoot?

Tell Marty we are still only using the 300yd target for practice...out to 700

Cameron

DaveMc · Post by **DaveMc** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:13 am

Hey Cameron - "I will if you do" (but you go first!)
You must have been in Marty's ear cause we went out to the 800m line last week for some hybrid trials and he insisted on the 300 target!!

Alan - I did notice the scores in TR were a little down. That makes your scores even more impressive when someone of Geoffs standard drops a few 4's. Great work!

Dave

RDavies · Post by **RDavies** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 5:04 am

Its been a while since we have been hearing the jibes (previously often justified) about F std beating F Open. People are now realy starting to get these open cartridges working, but much more importantly, how to steer them. Soon enough F/TR will start catching up to F/std levels as well I think.

Barry Davies · Post by **Barry Davies** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 7:36 am

FS is a worry is'nt it? :lol:

Barry

DaveMc · Post by **DaveMc** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:24 am

After years of ribbing about F open scores Barry I believe we are entitled to having a little fun in the other direction.

Post by **AlanF** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:45 am

Look at the relative scores F-Open to F/TR to F-Std.

http://www.nswfclass.com.au/results_of_tumut_1000.pdf

Could be a look into the future?

Alan :twisted:

Barry Davies · Post by **Barry Davies** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:29 pm

Just wait until they approve the Berger for FS and any weight 308 for F/TR :lol:

Barry

bartman007 · Post by **bartman007** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:07 pm

Hey Barry, why do FS and F/TR need to have Berger's approved? The scores that I've seen of late (including TR), would imply that the NRAA approved projectiles are more than good enough

Some shooters are getting exceptional scores with standard Sierra's and Dyer's, so I don't think they need Bergers. If they were, then they'd be shooting 60.10 all the time :twisted:

Post by **AlanF** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:12 pm

bartman007 wrote:Hey Barry, why do FS and F/TR need to have Berger's approved?...

Mike,

Its because they want to be more like F-Open. That's understandable.

Alan

mike H · Post by **mike H** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:52 pm

AlanF wrote:Look at the relative scores F-Open to F/TR to F-Std.

http://www.nswfclass.com.au/results_of_tumut_1000.pdf

Could be a look into the future?

Alan

Alan,
I would not take a lot of notice of those FTR scores relative to F/S, in reality they were only training/experimental results. The second and third place getters in FTR are two of the best F/S shooters in NSW. Both were trialling loads and had not time to do justice to the event. Neither were happy with their loads and both would have done better with their normal F/S rifles and ammo. The only reason I got ahead of them was that my gear was better. I used some match rifle ammo that was lying in the cupboard, after I changed to 208 grain A Max`s.It had 200 grain SMK projectiles and the wind can move them quite easily, as my second stage showed.
Mike.

DaveMc · Post by **DaveMc** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:07 pm

Hey Mike don't let the truth get in the road of a good story (or in this case a good "gee up") :wink:

Barry Davies · Post by **Barry Davies** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 5:47 pm

Hey Mike,
FS and F/TR don't NEED to have Bergers approved, it's just that F/TR is not F/TR without fully complying ( ammo wise ) and it's a foregone conclusion that TR and FS will have Bergers approved. Not because I want them, because somebody else wants them.
It has nothing to do with wanting to be like FO- unless FO shooters plan to come down to using 155's :lol:

Barry

bruce moulds · Post by **bruce moulds** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:24 pm

not much of this sort of thing at lower light!
keep safe,
bruce.

Post by **AlanF** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 6:07 pm

bruce moulds wrote:not much of this sort of thing at lower light!
keep safe,
bruce.

Bruce,

I have moved your expert advice on an unrelated topic to
HERE. I knew that's what you would want....

Alan

FIVE 60s IN A ROW

Bergers for F Std - Why?

Re: Bergers for F Std - Why?