6.5 x 284 build

Get or give advice on equipment, reloading and other technical issues.

Moderator: Mod

Old Trev-39
Posts: 301
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 2:07 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: 6.5 x 284 build

Post by Old Trev-39 »

My Swede is on a Barnard 98 year of manufacture and no problems with case rim size.
Cheers,
Trevor.
Tim L
Posts: 975
Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 7:11 pm
Location: Townsville
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 461 times

Re: 6.5 x 284 build

Post by Tim L »

Gyro wrote:Nice, thanks. Now do you reckon the brass can be hit hard enough just once with say a full case of Trailboss and a cast lead boolit at fire forming, to 'harden' the brass enough before using fullhouse loads ? I certainly like that system for fireforming as it's fairly cheap and easy and avoids shagging around with say the cream of wheat fill method. I just run an oily bore to avoid leading up the bore.

Yes.
The brass is pretty close to chamber size from the die, its only a case of forming the shoulder properly . Its not like you're stretching a BR into a Dasher.
It''s exactly how I did the majority of my cases ( only using some old Speer projectiles)
Shot from 800m and i doubt they got half way there :lol:
GSells
Posts: 801
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 11:04 pm
Location: Qld
Has thanked: 948 times
Been thanked: 272 times

Re: 6.5 x 284 build

Post by GSells »

bruce moulds wrote:tim,
when the majority of shooters force the governing body to shoot 3 to a target bisley style, and those scores continue i will be more inclined to agree with you.
at the moment, most are even scared of a delay on electronic targets.
bruce.

Challenge accepted! Bring it on !
Rich4
Posts: 618
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2019 2:33 pm
Location: Chinchilla
Has thanked: 2091 times
Been thanked: 255 times

Re: 6.5 x 284 build

Post by Rich4 »

:lol: That’s the spirit, full speed ahead damn the torpedoes
AlanF
Posts: 7532
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Maffra, Vic
Has thanked: 229 times
Been thanked: 936 times

Re: 6.5 x 284 build

Post by AlanF »

AlanF wrote:Comparing wind reading skills between TR and F-Class shooters is hard to do, because TR shooters have to contend with more challenges in terms of optics and holding steady. They also have lighter rifles, thinner barrels and heavier triggers (than F-Open and F/TR). The major handicap though is shared by F-Std which is ballistics i.e. .308 and 155gn projectiles.

You would expect however, that F-Class shooters generally should find it easier to learn how to read wind because they will benefit from getting more reliable feedback because of the higher precision of their shooting. When a TR shooter gets a wide shot, they are more likely to be unsure about the cause - was it me, was it the wind? etc.

Our range has just closed (again) so having too much time on my hands, I'll modify my simulator to at least see how much TR and F-Std scores should be affected by their ballistic disadvantage, and see how that compares with real world score data. That could be taken further with some estimates of how shooting precision is affected by things like optical sights etc., possibly good enough to support an "informed opinion" on the subject :D .

I've started another thread on this subject HERE.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic