Rankings Updated After Nationals

For general announcements, and anything which does not fit into one of the categories below.

Moderator: Mod

AlanF
Posts: 7532
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Maffra, Vic
Has thanked: 229 times
Been thanked: 936 times

Rankings Updated After Nationals

Post by AlanF »

See http://www.ozfclass.com/rankings/default.html

All the winners won both leadup and Queens at the nationals, so big moves up the list for Shane and Craig, and Nick has jumped well into the lead of F-Std.

Just wondering if it would be worth adding another column for "Ranking 1 yr Earlier". It would show who has had a good year etc. Comments anyone?
RAVEN
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Adelaide South Australia (CTV)
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Rankings Updated After Nationals

Post by RAVEN »

Hi Alan any chance that the SARA Hunt & Queens can be included for 2015

RB :)
AlanF
Posts: 7532
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Maffra, Vic
Has thanked: 229 times
Been thanked: 936 times

Re: Rankings Updated After Nationals

Post by AlanF »

RAVEN wrote:Hi Alan any chance that the SARA Hunt & Queens can be included for 2015

RB :)


My humble apologies to South Australia. Don't know how that happened. Its the first mistake I've ever made :^o .

I'll get onto it before anyone else notices :lol: .
AlanF
Posts: 7532
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Maffra, Vic
Has thanked: 229 times
Been thanked: 936 times

Re: Rankings Updated After Nationals

Post by AlanF »

It was only F-Open, and now fixed.
RAVEN
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Adelaide South Australia (CTV)
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Rankings Updated After Nationals

Post by RAVEN »

Yes I know you don't make many Alan
can you please check the field size :mrgreen:
AlanF
Posts: 7532
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Maffra, Vic
Has thanked: 229 times
Been thanked: 936 times

Re: Rankings Updated After Nationals

Post by AlanF »

All field sizes checked. Please read About the Rankings, Points for Placings, first sentence. :mrgreen:
RAVEN
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Adelaide South Australia (CTV)
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Rankings Updated After Nationals

Post by RAVEN »

Hi Alan
from the SARA web site queens results there was a field of 12 yet the points awarded are on a field size of 11 (scale 8)

Based on the table I should be awarded 27 points not 12

FS had a field of 15 not 13
FTR had a field of 13 not 10

NRAA FO field was 21 and that is what it states in the rankings


Have I missed something here :shock:

RB :)
AlanF
Posts: 7532
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Maffra, Vic
Has thanked: 229 times
Been thanked: 936 times

Re: Rankings Updated After Nationals

Post by AlanF »

RAVEN wrote:Hi Alan
from the SARA web site queens results there was a field of 12 yet the points awarded are on a field size of 11 (scale 8)

Based on the table I should be awarded 27 points not 12

FS had a field of 15 not 13
FTR had a field of 13 not 10

NRAA FO field was 21 and that is what it states in the rankings


Have I missed something here :shock:

RB :)

You've actually missed quite a few things :D .

If you'd like to read the "Points for Placings" paragraph in "About the Rankings", it says that field size is the number of shooters who have non-zero scores at every range. In the F-Open Queens, D Williamson scored zero at the first 800yd so does not contribute to the field size, so the field size is 11. Your 3rd place is therefore taken from the previous row of the points table, and gets 12 points. This is also explained under the "Points for Placings" heading.

The other figures regarding lower field sizes are also due to some shooters not shooting all ranges. In F-Std for example, 3 pulled out at various times on the second day of the Queens.

The National Queens field size counted 21, but didn't include the McEwans who only shot the last day.

So apart from the fact that the F-Open figure were omitted, I haven't found any other mistakes.
RAVEN
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Adelaide South Australia (CTV)
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Rankings Updated After Nationals

Post by RAVEN »

Harsh but those are the rules I guess :(
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic