Hi All,
I have a sleeved Remington 700 action that I was thinking of barrelling with a 30" x 1.25" parallel in .284 Win. Was wondering if the short tennon length that the Rem. has would it be suitable. The sleeve is 1.5" longer than front of action. Also would bedding about 1.0" of barrel in front of sleeve help support the weight of the barrel. Have asked around the north here and getting conflicting answers. Thought I would put this question out there for more experienced opinions and it may also help some one else out.
Cheers,
Trevor.
Remingtin Action
Moderator: Mod
-
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 2:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Remingtin Action
I had thought about it but my conclusion was to stick with a hv taper at most. That never failed as long as I had it.
-
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:00 pm
- Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
- Has thanked: 167 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Remingtin Action
This is not a Remington but I thought I'd throw it out there.
I run Savages at the moment. They only have close to 3/4" tennon length threaded in to the action. I have been running 1.125" straight profile, 32" long barrels that weigh 3.6kg (.284W) without any issue. I've run 6BR, .284W and .300wsm in that configuration. No bedding under the barrel. They don't move.
You could run a barrel block and then it wouldn't matter.
I run Savages at the moment. They only have close to 3/4" tennon length threaded in to the action. I have been running 1.125" straight profile, 32" long barrels that weigh 3.6kg (.284W) without any issue. I've run 6BR, .284W and .300wsm in that configuration. No bedding under the barrel. They don't move.
You could run a barrel block and then it wouldn't matter.
Re: Remingtin Action
Hi Trev
I don't see an issue running a straight 1.25" barrel off a sleeved Rem, provided it was pillar bedded, I also see no need to bed any part of the barrel.
I run a custom 1.35" action similar in profile to a Rem 40x (solid bottom) but with twin ports and use straight barrels with no ill effects.
Regards
Matt
I don't see an issue running a straight 1.25" barrel off a sleeved Rem, provided it was pillar bedded, I also see no need to bed any part of the barrel.
I run a custom 1.35" action similar in profile to a Rem 40x (solid bottom) but with twin ports and use straight barrels with no ill effects.
Regards
Matt
-
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 12:46 am
- Location: Cowra NSW
- Has thanked: 776 times
- Been thanked: 537 times
Re: Remingtin Action
Matt P wrote:Hi Trev
I don't see an issue running a straight 1.25" barrel off a sleeved Rem, provided it was pillar bedded, I also see no need to bed any part of the barrel.
I run a custom 1.35" action similar in profile to a Rem 40x (solid bottom) but with twin ports and use straight barrels with no ill effects.
Regards
Matt
Trev, your question has been answered by Matt above & I agree with him.

Keith H.
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 2:37 pm
- Location: PERTH
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: Remingtin Action
I have a sleeved Remington built by Dave Kerr and his advice was there should be no issues with running a parallel barrel..
Also pillar bedded preferred as Matt P stated.
Also pillar bedded preferred as Matt P stated.
BRETT BUNYAN F CLASS OPEN SHOOTER W.A.
-
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 2:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Remingtin Action
Hi all,
Thanks for the information, it is much appreciated. I will go ahead with this project. The sleeve has recoil lug machined in manufacture and is pillar bedded.
Again thanks,
Trevor.
Thanks for the information, it is much appreciated. I will go ahead with this project. The sleeve has recoil lug machined in manufacture and is pillar bedded.
Again thanks,
Trevor.