DenisA wrote:Alan, what does your complete rifle weigh?
Its 9.9Kg.
DenisA wrote:Does it torque much?
Definitely less than the Mastin. I put that down in part to the low profile, and the balance point is much further forward. I should also mention that I have a very heavy rear bag (8Kg), which I believe counteracts some of the sideways forces resulting from stopping the torque effect.
DenisA wrote:Does the barrel ever touch or come close to touching the front bag as it vibrates after the shot?
That was a problem I noticed immediately, and kept having to dent the middle of the front bag to prevent it. However the solution was to use a couple of cable ties pulled very tight crossed over the middle of the front bag.
DenisA wrote:Although less than the Mastin, how much does the forend flex? Can you still squeeze the barrel and forks together with one hand?
A little more than half the force to get the same deflection (as the Mastin) vertically. The forks cannot be squeezed vertically with one hand even a mm. There was too much horizontal flexibility with the forks until I fitted the aluminium bag stop across them. It is now negligible.
DenisA wrote:I know you didn't like the crude test of squeezing the barrel and forend together.
The test could be standardised to give an actual result and figure for comparison between stocks by sitting the rifle on its rest (normal shooting position), the barrel overhanging a bench and the butt held down. The muzzle could be pulled down using a cheap spring scale. The result would be forend deflection per kg. Eg. my front rest/stock/barrel configuration may have 1 mm/kg of flex at the forend.
Done over a dozen configurations it may be an educating way of identifying an acceptable level regarding "How much flex is too much flex to consistently hold the X ring"............. so to speak.
Obviously there are other factors in stock design, but this certainly an important one I feel.
I'd like to see a fore-end deflection tool manufactured and marketed. When you see some of the useless stuff that Sinclairs and others try to foist on shooters, this could be of real value to stock builders.
Alan