OK so I have been doing a bit of pre Queens reading and was looking at the target Dimensions and there are a couple of things that I don't quite get / want to check. 1) Are all the 800, 900, and 1000 yard targets actually all the same dimension? 2) Outer (2) ring appears to be 30mm bigger than the height of the target? and 3) What is the "Aim" dimension? at 300 and 400 it would appear to be the same as the Outer ring but then it goes a little haywire!
Sorry for the novice (and potentially idiotic) questions but you have to learn somehow!
2019-04-06 (2) by James Elphick, on Flickr
Cheers
James
Target Dimensions
Moderator: Mod
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:39 pm
Re: Target Dimensions
And whilst we are at it, if someone could check that my scoring cheat sheet looks about correct that would be fantastic...
2019-04-06 (12) by James Elphick, on Flickr
Edited to show corrected version
James
2019-04-06 (12) by James Elphick, on Flickr
Edited to show corrected version
James
Last edited by UL1700 on Sat Apr 06, 2019 9:45 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 7501
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm
- Location: Maffra, Vic
Re: Target Dimensions
1) Yes
2) That's correct. Its possible to get a miss high or low despite being less than 1830mm from the middle.
3) Aiming mark coincides with the 2 ring up to 400, then coincides with the 3 ring.
2) That's correct. Its possible to get a miss high or low despite being less than 1830mm from the middle.
3) Aiming mark coincides with the 2 ring up to 400, then coincides with the 3 ring.
-
- Posts: 7501
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm
- Location: Maffra, Vic
Re: Target Dimensions
A couple of things need changing on your table. Indicator for a 1 is black. F Class 6 is just 6 (not Super). BTW for TR V-Bull may also be called Centre or Centre Bull.
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:39 pm
Re: Target Dimensions
Fantastic, thanks for the help Alan, there is a lot of misinformation out there, minor differences between countries and good old designer error! Crib sheet updated accordingly...
2019-04-06 (12) by James Elphick, on Flickr
Cheers
James
2019-04-06 (12) by James Elphick, on Flickr
Cheers
James
-
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:33 pm
- Location: Hamilton
- Contact:
Re: Target Dimensions
Hi James, also easier to use inches rather than millimeters as most scope adjustments are in inches
You might as well be yourself, everyone else is already taken.
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:39 pm
Re: Target Dimensions
DannyS wrote:Hi James, also easier to use inches rather than millimeters as most scope adjustments are in inches
I agree and I have an Imperial and a MOA per range version in Excel but that was taken straight out of the rule book.
James
Return to “Equipment & Technical”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests