Overload

johnk · Post by **johnk** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:41 am

I just can't believe this!

https://imageshack.com/i/f0SBeBSIj

aaronraad · Post by **aaronraad** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:24 pm

Do the powders even look the same???

But did the Vortex survive, hold zero and click okay???

johnk · Post by **johnk** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:45 pm

Clicked AND rattled most likely. :lol:

aaronraad · Post by **aaronraad** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 4:23 pm

johnk wrote:Clicked AND rattled most likely.

You signed off on the Sightron sponsorship deal didn't you

IanP · Post by **IanP** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 8:25 pm

Wow!
Maybe with poor eyesight the H110 numbering looks a bit like H1000 but he is lucky to have any eyesight at all after that mistake.

Ian

aaronraad · Post by **aaronraad** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 9:04 pm

I wonder how thick your barrel has to get before the action lets go first, or does your barrel just get that pregnant look about it for the first 8"?

Brad Y · Post by **Brad Y** » Wed Aug 06, 2014 12:11 am

From memory H110 is the same as winchester 296. I used to load a bit of 296 in the 22 hornet I used to own. In terms of handling gunpowder, that shit is like garnet sand running through your hands. It used to even leak out the side of the powder thrower it was that fine. So its quite different in comparison to large kernels of slower burning magnum powder. I support those thinking along the lines of the natural selection idea...