
And below again is 9 shots of a 400 yd Comp on the weekend !

Sort of looking similar ? What do u think ? I ran out of ammo doh! A stuff up on my part !
Moderator: Mod
Footsore wrote:Looks like you are onto a good thing Graham. Any wind? Looks like the X ring was playing hard to get.
Steve
Tod7.62 wrote:Looking good Graham. The target looks cool does it feed back to your phone?
DenisA wrote:G'day Graham,
I know your aware of this stuff already but I'll add to your thread.
I like to do my load testing at 100yards too. I would follow Williada's advice if I had a 140y opportunity.
I believe that testing at 100yards can yield an extremely competitive load but you have to be really careful in your interpretation of the results. I've seen plenty of groups where a bug hole that looks great and measures .4 - .5 moa opens up as the range increases due to all the parabolic effects and makes it a little less than competetive. I believe that if your testing at 100y and want to easily keep vertical within the 6 ring at the longer ranges, you have to find a load that's an absolute max of 0.3moa and low SD for the longer ranges.
Here's my example. Below is the best load (within a reasonable amount of testing) that I could find with that experimental barrel weight/damper attached to my barrel. I haven't measured it accurately but it looks like it measures about .35 - .4moa centre to centre given that the holes are .284".
I took this load to 300m a few weeks ago to test and the below pic was the result of 13 shots. Not including the low 5:00 shot, its basically a split group of .5moa. Including the low shot its opened up to what I'd guess is about .7moa. In this game we cant afford to have more than X'ring vertical at the shorter ranges.
I'm looking forward to testing my latest non barrel weighted load at 400 this weekend.
What do you think your 100y load measures?