Sierras

Get or give advice on equipment, reloading and other technical issues.

Moderator: Mod

saum2
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:22 am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 111 times

Sierras

Post by saum2 »

Sierra 80gn .224 prodjectiles are in short supply again. At least the VRA don't have any and was told there wasn't any in Australia. Some problem with the importers I'm told. Same story different year. Maybe we should be able to use any brand or supplier.
Chopper
Posts: 1038
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:04 pm
Location: Albury
Been thanked: 29 times

Post by Chopper »

There is NO reason you cant, it just becomes FO, WORK IT OUT ?? thats where it will go.















T
saum2
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:22 am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 111 times

Post by saum2 »

Yes..... I'm seriously looking at FTR & Open, no restrictions
johnk
Posts: 2211
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:55 pm
Location: Brisbane
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Post by johnk »

Wouldn't the .223 be even less competitive under F/TR allowances?
bartman007
Posts: 921
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:06 pm
Location: Gippsland
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 129 times

Post by bartman007 »

Hey Krakey,

You do have a selection of other projies, as per the rules downloaded from the NRAA website just now:

PROJECTILES ALLOWED
The following projectiles are at present approved for handloading for Target
Rifle and F Class Standard Disciplines.
.308 Calibre
Sierra MatchKing 2155 155 grain.
Sierra Palma MatchKing 2156 155 grain.
BJD - HBC .308 155 grain.
Nosler HPBT .308 155 grain.

.223 Calibre
Sierra - MatchKing:- .224 69 grain.
Sierra - MatchKing:- .224 80 grain.
Hornady – Amax:- .224 80 grain.
Nosler – HPBT:- .224 80 grain.

Hope that helps. Maybe SARA would have stock, they have been very helpful in the past!!!

Otherwise, come and join us in Open class. There is heaps to choose from, and supply is generally quite good from SARA or Stuart Elliot from QLD.

Good luck.
Fireman_DJ
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:33 pm
Location: Sale Victoria

Post by Fireman_DJ »

Why would a .223 be less competitive in F/TR?

Less weight and no front rest, but at least you don't have to compete with 6BR's and the like.

Not quite F Standard, but it'll allow him to compete with .308's and .223's with his choice of projectiles in a competitive manner.


You just need to convince your club to take up F/TR if that's the way you wish to go.
bruce moulds
Posts: 2900
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:07 pm
Has thanked: 413 times
Been thanked: 330 times

Post by bruce moulds »

there are noises coming out of usa that with a correct chamber, a long barrel, and re17, 90 gn bergers can be got close to 3000.
that will make any 308 loads eyes pop. it might also keep some of the smaller cased sixes looking a bit poorly.
keep safe,
bruce.
"SUCH IS LIFE" Edward Kelly 11 nov 1880
http://youtu.be/YRaRCCZjdTM
John E
Posts: 1015
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by John E »

Trade the 223 in for a 308 -- problem solved!!!

John
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Post by macguru »

John E wrote:Trade the 223 in for a 308 -- problem solved!!!

John


I have not seen any 223s that can keep up with a good 308 under all conditions and ranges to 800m for f class. Only at closer ranges OR very steady conditions. I have both but use my 223 mainly at 300m.& 400m , where they are equally accurate most of the time
Barry Davies
Posts: 1397
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 232 times

Post by Barry Davies »

If it won't shoot accurately at 1000yards, you are wasting your time and money.
Barry
AlanF
Posts: 7532
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Maffra, Vic
Has thanked: 229 times
Been thanked: 936 times

Post by AlanF »

The NRAA and State Association shops have a captive market thanks to the restricted projectile rules for TR and F-Std. With this goes an added responsibility for reliable supply. If this is all too hard, then the decent thing would be to go the F/TR way by allowing any projectile in TR and F-Std. Its done overseas - why not here?
bartman007
Posts: 921
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:06 pm
Location: Gippsland
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 129 times

Additional projectiles

Post by bartman007 »

If this is all too hard, then the decent thing would be to go the F/TR way by allowing any projectile in TR and F-Std. Its done overseas - why not here?


Mmmmmmmmm.........that'd be nice!

155.5 grain Bergers in F Std :-)

Then we'd have to ban 300 yards, because it would be too easy :wink:

May as well ban 500 yards too :P
saum2
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:22 am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 111 times

Post by saum2 »

thanks Alan, My point exactly, if the NRAA cannot supply the restricted projectiles. use the full ICFRA rules & throw it open like overseas.
Geoff
Barry Davies
Posts: 1397
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 232 times

Post by Barry Davies »

The reason it's not done here Alan is that the NRAA and State associations would then lose that captive market and the dollars that go with it.
I suppose they could increase membership fees to cover what they lose on projectiles.
Barry
bobeager
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:29 pm
Location: Goulburn NSW Australia
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Post by bobeager »

NRAA not the only source. See specials on Nosler 224 80g @ $180 per 1000 and 308 155g @ $229 per 1000 at Cleaver Firearms
look down the specials page,

www.cleaverfirearms.com/Specials%202.htm
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic